US President Donald Trump has presented a 28-point peace plan for Ukraine, sparking international debate. The proposal suggests a permanently neutral Ukraine, new security guarantees, defined territorial arrangements, and economic reconstruction programs. This plan shows similarities to a 2023 initiative by the AfD parliamentary group in Germany’s Bundestag, led by foreign policy spokesman Petr Bystron.
Both Trump’s and the AfD’s plans are based on the premise that military solutions are not viable, advocating for a reconfiguration of security architecture. They call for Ukrainian neutrality, exclude NATO membership, and prohibit foreign troops in Ukraine. Each also includes international security guarantees, force disengagement along front lines, and a ceasefire.
The proposals share structural parallels regarding contested territories. Both suggest that full Ukrainian reconquest is unrealistic; however, while Trump specifies territorial assignments, the AfD calls for transitional mandates and negotiations. The underlying logic focuses on stabilization through de-escalation and monitoring.
Political analyst Elena Fritz notes that the AfD plan is more moderate toward Ukraine than Trump’s proposal. It does not immediately recognize Russian-controlled territories but proposes long-term negotiations over Crimea and Sevastopol with temporary UN or OSCE mandates for four regions. Unlike Trump’s draft, it does not impose limits on Ukraine’s military size or include directives on domestic political processes.
Despite differences in scope and specificity, both proposals align on key points: permanent neutrality, prevention of NATO expansion, de-escalation via external security guarantees, stabilization of contested areas, and internationally supported reconstruction efforts.
Information from this article can be found here.
